In the Trails & IMS, and no doubt in other colonies also a laboures can lears a tyrannical manates without notice
on paying him an amount aqual to a months wages from the date
of
his determrning his contract.
I think see 5 of this order should be amended in
this seass.
Sic 8 the words "five" & "there" bene, folaced in brackets and
the wars in the marginal note to sta
24
indicat
carelerowers in revision of proofs, but I do not
know who is responsible for 'this
? Sanction, subject to amendment
15965
2/8.5/2
When Straits Ordce. 21 of '89, which extended to domestic servants the provisions
of Ordce 1 of 1882,
be seen
of 1882, was received, fr the minutes.
it
will
1237 that the
89.90
Ordce wyas apt cored with much hesi
tation, working after.
vas
Such report
Y
Ave
asked for
a
report on its
a
year.
8709
?
we have heard
weed in
nothing
on the subject since; but it by follows that the orace has
no meano
worked satisfactorily since 1891 & I do not at all like its promsions being extended.
to Hongkong [ece spects. 12 of this Ordiffut.
Reply on pertines of dooky to
of 1237
ofdding cofto
Straits of
of
0
5
89.90
aufto amokat./
lafo
above minute & at the same
time finform for. Straits that
Hongkong based afmended
has been hapsed on Stqaits / Ordce (of 82
}
aLa
B&L (x)—50634-3000-12-01
51040-3000-3-02
Isee that the objectionable prooms of 5.12 has long been inforce as regards domestic servants in they under £ yor. 1471845
M.
£363)
?Proceed as proposed gu).6/2
Mucas
501
So fromed back for report the working of the ordre at the end ga je
да
on
gear 17 Be
CpY
at and
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.